Sinopharm, J&J, Sputnik Vaccines Are Weaker Against Omicron In New Study


 
14.2k
Shares
 

By John Liu, Dong Lyu & Jake Rudnitsky

Prior infection plus Pfizer’s mRNA shots give best immunity. Countries looking at booster shots as omicron spreads rapidly.

Covid-19 shots made by China’s state-owned Sinopharm and U.S. drugmaker Johnson & Johnson, as well as the Sputnik vaccine developed by Russia, were found to produce little or no antibodies against omicron in a study, as evidence of the new variant’s vaccine-evading abilities mount.

Researchers at the University of Washington and Swiss drugmaker Humabs Biomed SA analyzed the efficacy of six vaccines against the highly-infectious and most-mutated Covid variant. Only three out of 13 people who had taken both doses of Sinopharm’s shot showed neutralizing antibodies against omicron. For J&J, this metric dropped to one out of 12 samples. None of the 11 people fully vaccinated with Sputnik generated such antibodies.

The study, which has been published as a pre-print and is yet to be peer-reviewed, also found that the lowest reduction in protective antibodies come from a combination of prior infection and two doses of Pfizer Inc.’s mRNA shots. Antibody levels in this sub-set of people dropped five-fold, compared to 44-fold for those who took both the shots from Pfizer but didn’t have a history of Covid infection.

Russia’s Gamaleya Center, which developed Sputnik, said in a statement the serum samples used in the study were not representative and conclusions about the vaccine’s efficacy against omicron based on them shouldn’t be made.

A preliminary study showed that Sputnik is expected to provide a strong defense against severe cases of the variant, Gamaleya’s partner, the Russian Direct Investment Fund, said in a statement Friday.

Emerging research that some of the most widely-used vaccines provide only a partial shield against omicron is making anxious governments impose travel curbs and accelerate booster shot campaigns in a bid to avert further virus waves and economy-gutting lockdowns. The new variant, which infects 70 times faster than the deadly delta, has rapidly spread to some 77 countries in less than one month of being first detected in southern Africa.

The latest study found that people vaccinated with two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Inc. shots also generated fewer antibodies. So did those with the viral vector vaccine developed by the University of Oxford and AstraZeneca Plc -- a finding consistent with other studies that there’s marked loss of protection.

Improve Protection

Studies earlier this week showed that Sinovac Biotech Ltd.’s vaccine -- one of the most widely used in the world along with the Pfizer-BioNTech shot -- also didn’t provide sufficient antibodies after two doses against omicron and boosters will likely be needed to improve protection.

This has left scientists and public health authorities scrambling for ways to raise protection against the new variant, including bringing forward third doses to just three months after the second, mixing and matching different vaccines and developing a new generation of omicron-targeted shots.

Still, studies probing antibody levels are looking at just one arm of the immune response that protect people from infection. The other arm of the immune response is cell mediated immunity -- known as T-cell response -- which can protect people from serious illness and death. Research is still ongoing on how T-cells respond to omicron.


 
14.2k
Shares
 

Articles in this issue:

Journal of Medicine Sign Up

Get the Journal of Medicine delivered to your inbox.

Thank you for subscribing.

No membership required*

Masthead

    • Editor-in Chief:
    • Theodore Massey
    • Editor:
    • Robert Sokonow
    • Editorial Staff:
    • Musaba Dekau
      Lin Takahashi
      Thomas Levine
      Cynthia Casteneda Avina
      Ronald Harvinger
      Lisa Andonis

Leave a Comment

Please keep in mind that all comments are moderated. Please do not use a spam keyword or a domain as your name, or else it will be deleted. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for your comments!

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.