Medical Journals Get Letters From DOJ


 
67.3k
Shares
 

By Kristina Fiore

A federal prosecutor sent a letter to a medical journal editor, probing whether the publication is "partisan" when it comes to "various scientific debates."

Edward R. Martin Jr., U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, sent a list of questions to CHEST Editor-in-Chief Peter Mazzone, MD, MPH, of the Cleveland Clinic, asking how the journal handles "misinformation" and "competing viewpoints," among other things.

At least two other journals have received similar letters.

"It has been brought to my attention that more and more journals and publications like CHEST Journal are conceding that they are partisans in various scientific debates," the letter stated.

Martin's letter asks five questions, including how the journal assesses its "responsibilities to protect the public from misinformation," and how it "clearly articulate[s] to the public when you have certain viewpoints that are influenced by your ongoing relations with supporters, funders, advertisers, and others."

It also asks whether the journal accepts manuscripts from "competing viewpoints" as well as how it assesses the role of "funding organizations like the National Institutes of Health in the development of submitted articles."

Finally, it asks how the journal handles allegations that authors "may have misled their readers."

"I am also interested to know if publishers, journals, and organizations with which you work are adjusting their method of acceptance of competing viewpoints," Martin wrote. "Are there new norms being developed and offered?"

Martin requested a response by May 2.

The letter to CHEST was dated April 14 and was originally posted on X by Eric Reinhart, MD, of Chicago.

Mazzone did not return a request for comment, but the American College of Chest Physicians, which publishes CHEST, confirmed that it had received the letter and said in an email that its attorneys were reviewing it, and added that the letter’s content “was posted online without our knowledge.”

The American College of Chest Physicians also issued a statement saying that CHEST “has published numerous articles that were breakthroughs in scientific research and clinical treatment, advancing the medical profession and improving the health and well-being of patients worldwide. CHEST adheres to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICJME) and the COPE ethical guidelines for scholarly publishing, applying strict peer review standards to ensure scientific rigor.” The statement concluded, “As the publisher, the American College of Chest Physicians respects and supports the journal’s editorial independence.”

Adam Gaffney, MD, MPH, a pulmonary and critical care physician at Cambridge Health Alliance in Massachusetts, said the letter "should send a chill down the spine of scientists and physicians."

"It is yet another example of the Trump administration's effort to control academic inquiry and stifle scientific discourse -- an administration, it warrants mentioning, that has embraced medical misinformation and pseudoscience to reckless effect," Gaffney said in an email. "Journal editors should join together and publicly renounce this as yet more thinly guised anti-science political blackmail."

JT Morris, a senior supervising attorney at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, noted that in a First Amendment case such as this, the law is clear: "A publication's editorial decisions are none of the government's business, whether it's a newspaper or a medical journal."

"When a United States Attorney wields the power of his office to target medical journals because of their content and editorial processes, he isn't doing his job, let alone upholding his constitutional oath," Morris said in an email. "He's abusing his authority to try to chill protected speech."

"Like with any bully, the best response is to stand up to them -- and that includes officials who try to intimidate Americans into parroting the government's view," he added. "The First Amendment packs a powerful punch, and it has these medical journals' backs."

Joyce Frieden contributed reporting to this story.


 
67.3k
Shares
 

Articles in this issue:

Leave a Comment

Please keep in mind that all comments are moderated. Please do not use a spam keyword or a domain as your name, or else it will be deleted. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for your comments!

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.